Thursday, December 06, 2007

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney delivered an inspiring speech on the importance of freedom of religion at the George Bush Presidential Library this evening. He struck the absolute right note--he gamely admitted the role his Mormon faith plays in his life but denied that he would be "a Mormon president." He promised to be the president of all Americans, which was a given for anyone who knows anything about American politicians. He noted that his father, a devout Mormon, led volunteer organizations and marched with Martin Luther King. He implied the question that has been burning in my mind since the announcement: Why in the name of all that is holy can't a Mormon be President? What is it that disqualifies him? If Catholics can't be disqualified on the belief that they actually eat the body and drink the blood of Christ at communion, there is little that should count against a candidate of faith. Romney drew blood when he declared unequivocally and with no obvious stammering, that Jesus Christ is "the Son of God, and savior of mankind." He has referred to Christ as his "personal savior" several times on the campaign trail. I'm not an expert theologian but isn't a belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ pretty much all that makes a Christian? Am I (gasp!) suggesting that Mormonism be included in the religion? Not at all. Even Romney admitted that different Mormons have different views on Christ. But is it possible that someone could worship in a Mormon church and believe in Jesus Christ the way ordinary Christians do and go to Heaven when they die? I don't know for sure, but why not? But the fact of the matter is, it shouldn't matter. What is being debated this year is Mitt Romney's fitness for the presidency, not the state of his eternal soul. He is, if anything, overqualified, for the job. Romney confidently declared that the American people would not vote for a President based on his religion, but said that if he was wrong, "so be it." He would not back away from the faith of his fathers. He should not have to.

The Pendragon has less faith than Romney in this regard. Even on something as stupid as "Dancing with the Stars" Americans tend to rate likability higher than competence. Marie Osmond went to the finals of the show despite having less dancing ability than most couples who exited in the first couple weeks. The reason? Fans liked her. This does explain why Rudy Giuliani and Barack Obama are doing so well in the polls but it is hardly reassuring.

Comments:
well, isnt'it for most people of 'the religous right' religion the most important thing? They and don't have a clue (see BUSH Jr.) about a candidate's policy, (except maybe for his pro-life standing, unconditional support for israel)... and don't care as long as he's a devout christian...they sometimes truelly scare me.

am curious what will happen though, if they religous right stays at home, or if they will back one candidate...interesting that pat robertson supports Guiliani.
 
I'm not surprised about Robertson...social conservatism has never been as important to him as his money. He even backed away from criticizing Red China's mandatory abortion policy to protect his investment there. He's just a troublemaker.
 
**that Jesus Christ is "the Son of God, and savior of mankind." **

I don't beleive that is kosher mormon doctrine. They beleive Jesus Christ is "a" son of God. quite a vast difference. I'm wondering now if he was misquoted, mis-spoke or is mainstreaming his religion or none of the above? I guess I'm finally interested in knowing what he beleives. No, I don't beleive being a mormon disqualifies him for running for President of the US or even of me considering voting for him, but- mormonism is NOT just a different denomination of Christianity. Many of the things they say about their faith sound fairly orthodox until you read their extra biblical writings and prophets.
 
I listened to the entire speech. He definitely said "is" not "was" and "the Son of God and savior", not "a Son of God." Remember in the Last Battle Emeth gets into Heaven after having served Tash all his life because Aslan decided that nothing good could be done for Tash and nothing bad for him. So when someone did good in the name of Tash, he did it for Aslan. It's an intriguing idea. But the main thrust of my argument is that Romney needs to be considered on his qualifications for President, NOT his religion. If we start disqualifying people who believed strange things after all, there will be room for no one but the secular humanists. A Presybyterian minister once announced that he preferred Thomas Jefferson as President to "an aristocratical Christian" despite the sorrow he felt in knowing his President was an unbeliever.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?