Monday, July 18, 2005

The news just gets more interesting, folks. After all the hullaballoo about Karl Rove, with Chuck Schumer and others foaming at the mouth and demanding his resignation, the NYT over the weekend (you know the one, that bastion of conservative newspaper reporting) released the bombshell: ROVE WAS NOT THE SOURCE THAT LEAKED THE CIA AGENT'S NAME! The reporter still sits in jail refusing to name the source of her story and it turns out Rove learned the information from a reporter--he doesn't remember which one. Commentator Rush Limbaugh believes it was probably her own husband who leaked the information to the press. It is yet another instance of the trend: Democrats and liberals lie through their teeth about Republican presidents because they just can't stand the comparisons to their own. They needed some way to get to Bush and it would be good if people stopped thinking about terrorism in London and how the Bush administration is keeping it at bay and rooting it out abroad and more about some phony corruption among Bush's advisors. It just must drive the liberals mad to see how popular their three most hated Republicans are (Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and now George W. Bush) and they're willing to do anything to shatter that popularity--whether it's faking a felony called Watergate, making a big deal out of toppling communist dictators in Central America, or whether it's pinning leaking the name of a CIA agent on the President's top advisor.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?